|
Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more. READ TIME: 7 MINUTES | 15 JULY, 2026 | READ ON PHILHSC.COM I made the Australian age-group triathlon team in 2004 and competed at the World Championships that year. If there had been a most-unlikely-to-succeed award for that, my name would have been at the top of the list. My method was simple and stubborn. Show up to training twice a day, work hard, repeat. The 100km swim weeks were met with 100km run weeks. As far as I was concerned, recovery was not being at training. That thinking didn’t start with sport. Not being outworked was etched into me from my military years, and I carried it straight into corporate roles and then being a CEO. Recovery never featured. It never had to, until age and health decided to slow me down and I ran out of ways to argue with them. And I understand the idea of not taking recovery seriously or not knowing where to start when life is as busy as it is for you today. I’ve lived with that mental model for most of my working life. But let’s contrast elite athletes with senior leaders. Elite athletes train for four to five hours a day and actively recover for the rest of the day. They sleep, eat, stretch, and receive treatments to help improve sustained output, all in service of the training time that counts. A CEO performs for ten or twelve hours and recovers approximately never. Then, when judgement starts to slip, we reach for the wrong diagnosis and tell ourselves we have a discipline problem or there isn’t enough time in the day. We also have a strange relationship with the term ‘recovery’. We often equate recovery with a holiday or retreat or the sporting version of recovery (like a massage) that we once knew in the heyday of our long-lost athletic careers. Reframing recoveryRecovery isn’t the reward you collect once the performance is done. It’s the precondition for the performance being any good. We’ve inverted it. We treat rest as what you earn after the decisions are made, when it’s the thing that determines whether those decisions are worth making. Put it in terms nobody would argue with. You would never board a flight knowing the pilot had been awake for nineteen hours. You’d get off the plane. And yet that’s the condition many CEOs are in when they price a deal, restructure a team, or decide who to let go. We accept a state in ourselves that we would find disqualifying in anyone we hand our safety to. Easier saidIt’s easy for me to prescribe recovery from here, because I learned the hard way what ignoring it costs. But I know it’s different in your seat. An athlete’s year has an off-season built into it. The calendar does the work. Yours doesn’t. Nobody hands a CEO fifteen hours of recovery time. The pace is relentless and there’s always a reason this quarter is the one where rest has to wait. This isn’t a lecture about balance. Balance implies a steady state you get to settle into, and that state doesn’t exist in leadership. What does exist is design and the frame the CEOs I coach find useful is oscillation, not endurance. Endurance is what I did for two decades. Grind, hold on, hope and outlast. Oscillation is different. It’s the deliberate switch between full effort and full recovery at intervals you set. Here are three examples:
If you want to know whether any of this applies to you, don’t audit your calendar. Audit your decisions. Think about the worst call you made last quarter. Not the one that went wrong through bad luck, the one you’d take back if you could. Now ask what state you were in when you made it. How much sleep. How many consecutive weeks without a break. How long since you’d had a day where nobody could reach you. In my experience the answer is rarely a mystery once you look. The decision you regret and the state you were in tend to sit right next to each other. None of this makes you slowerThat’s the assumption underneath, that oscillation is a tax on ambition, that the people who rest get overtaken by the people who don’t. It runs the other way. The degradation is the tax. You just can’t feel it, because tired judgement rates itself as fine. That’s what makes it dangerous. It quietly lowers the quality of your decisions while telling you you’re operating normally. The resistance to taking recovery seriously usually comes down to one fear, that recovery means caring less. It doesn’t. I’m as ambitious now as I was at thirty, and I wouldn’t ask you to be any different. I have a narrower ask. Build in the recovery you need that your life will never hand you on its own, so the ambition has something to run on. Because there are two ways to lead a company. You can survive it, holding on and treating the exhaustion as proof you’re taking it seriously. Or you can enjoy it and show up to do the work, have energy left over to invest in the relationships that matter and when the time comes, leave the company in great shape for the next leader before stepping into the next arena with energy and excitement. Your call. What’s it going to be? That's all for this week. See you next Wednesday. Phil Hayes-St Clair PS If this essay helped, Episode 227: Why some decisions need speed while others need time from my podcast is worth a listen. Tune in on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. |
Five 10-minute curated insights in a private podcast to help you face CEO pressures. Then, each Wednesday, The Leadership Letter delivers one piece of clear, honest thinking from someone who has spent 20 years in the seat you're sitting in. Practical enough to use. Human enough to matter.
The Leadership Letter is a reader-supported publication. If you enjoyed it, forward it to a friend. Thank you! -- Phil Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more. READ TIME: 6 MINUTES | 9 SEPTEMBER, 2026 | READ ON PHILHSC.COM In January 1995, a coach collapsed on a practice court at the Australian Open. His name was Tim Gullikson. He had been having seizures the previous year, and neurologists in Germany had found a blood clot in his brain and put the attacks down to a heart defect but he...
Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more. READ TIME: 6 MINUTES | 2 SEPTEMBER, 2026 | READ ON PHILHSC.COM I'd like to share a hunch that's not fully formed, and I'd love your thoughts, so let me set the scene. As a CEO I used to think a lot about the forces that were creating unnecessary drag across my organisation. And by drag I was looking for places where a lack of clarity existed. My hypothesis was simple: The more clarity you can give your team, the more productive they can be with...
The Leadership Letter is a reader-supported publication. If you enjoyed it, forward it to a friend. Thank you! -- Phil. Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more. READ TIME: 7 MINUTES | 26 AUGUST, 2026 | READ ON PHILHSC.COM On 6 February 2018, SpaceX’s Falcon Heavy lifted off from Kennedy Space Center. I watched the livestream in awe. Its 27 Merlin engines created more than five million pounds of thrust to lift this massive spacecraft into space. There was a good chance it would end in a...